The multi-platform IPTV world we
live in makes for some great digital experiences, but is anyone making sure all
platforms can communicate the proper metadata for legal sharing of material?
Because without a standard, IPTV
is a “law-free” free-for-all of rights usage. And tracking it internationally in
such a multi-platform Babylon? Good luck with all that. Which begs the
question, “Who’s in charge of this situation and what are they doing about it?”
The good news is that the IEC and the ITU are in charge. (That’s the International Electrotechnical Commission and the International Telecommunication Union to me and you. And, you can check out IEC 62698 to drill even deeper into the standards.)
The good news is that the IEC and the ITU are in charge. (That’s the International Electrotechnical Commission and the International Telecommunication Union to me and you. And, you can check out IEC 62698 to drill even deeper into the standards.)
These two assessment and
conformity-oriented organizations joined together to create a new international metadata
standard that would facilitate the uniform communication and designation of rights
information for IPTV.
Here are a few things that made
it all happen.
The power of cross-discipline
cooperation.
As you might imagine, agreement on this far-reaching and multi-platform standard didn’t happen overnight or by accident.
As you might imagine, agreement on this far-reaching and multi-platform standard didn’t happen overnight or by accident.
Back in 2008—in Brazil—discussions
began that culminated in the two groups banding together for the task of creating this mutually desirable threshold.
The goal of “metadata for rights
information interoperability in IPTV services” aligned the IEC’s Technical
Committee covering audio, video, and multimedia systems & equipment with
the ITU’s Study Group addressing multimedia coding, systems, and applications.
And that’s a powerful combination of acumen.
Addressing the consumer
experience.
One element of consideration for the metadata standard involved not just the financial and legal concerns of rights reporting, but also a tip of the cap to the consumer’s experience.
One element of consideration for the metadata standard involved not just the financial and legal concerns of rights reporting, but also a tip of the cap to the consumer’s experience.
The groups combined their
expertise with the eventual goal of creating a metadata standard that would
allow cross-platform interoperability—but recognized that the international
solution of multimedia sharing rights would also benefit the consumer in terms
of creating better access to digital content.
In other words, a metadata
standard operating via IPTV across many platforms means a cleaner universal
access to content via those differing platforms. And, quite rightfully, the two
groups recognized that better access to desired content equals an improved
consumer experience.
Also, content providers are likely
to allow more content to be distributed with the protection of accurate rights metadata
and reporting to ensure that they realize the full potential of their digital assets.
Increased mobility means
increased platforms, devices, and technologies.
Because consumers are heavily trending toward more mobile communications—and ways to partake of digital content—the need for flexibility in platforms but standardization of content producers' rights was a core requirement of the metadata standardization.
Because consumers are heavily trending toward more mobile communications—and ways to partake of digital content—the need for flexibility in platforms but standardization of content producers' rights was a core requirement of the metadata standardization.
Let’s face it. Mobility isn’t
going away any time soon, so a metadata standard that can both protect the
rights of rights holders while allowing technology to flourish is paramount to
this international benchmark.
Interoperability was the focal
point.
Setting metadata standards is always a good thing. Standardization of data records keeps everyone on the same page. And, standards allow for analysis of like procedures in data processing and even data entry.
Setting metadata standards is always a good thing. Standardization of data records keeps everyone on the same page. And, standards allow for analysis of like procedures in data processing and even data entry.
But, in this case, the need for
all the platforms and devices to use the same metadata standard shaped the
initiative.
The threshold for
interoperability the IEC and ITU set was for an ease of exchange with rights
information across currently existing content management systems.
This way, as digital information is increasingly shared via IPTV, an expanding number of outlets will all use the same metadata standard for rights in the exponentially growing and less regulated world of IPTV.
Just click below and we’ll tell you all about the standards of “beyond expectations” performance you can expect with FYI.
IPTV content management system is one type of method to increase sales of business. which includes video management systems and many more.
ReplyDeleteThe feature rich functionality of content management system in IPTV will help to captivate your existing customers and clients with video,audio,pictures and html slides.
ReplyDeleteIn all kind of websites content management system play vital role because different website design companies doing work with different content management systems. Content management system in IPTV will help to captivate your existing customers.
ReplyDelete